It's Oh So Telling
Never trust any place that markets materials to "boys" and "girlhoods". If there was ever a problem with the uber-headship homeschool Nazi's, it's the sick reductionist objectification of women to mere charicatures, to simply "girlhood". If this isn't sold from the guys perspective, I dunno what is. I call it evil.
Anyways, the Vision Forum folks are just the next in the long line of Enlightenment-American-Presbyterian-Church-Splitting status quo. I'm sure Nick will pipe up and say they've got some good things to say, and I'm sure its there, tucked away, somewhere.
You know, its a funny thing, that speck of white on top of a pile of bird crap...
Josiah Q. Roe | By Josiah Roe | 10:39 PM
Comments
Word. Aren't they nearly theonomist too?
Posted by: Evan Donovan at December 16, 2004 12:15 AM
Don't ask me how, but somehow or other my parents got on the Vision Forum mailing list. With the exception of the calligraphy set, the stuff in the "girlhood" collection made me want to vomit (and don't get me started on Elsie Dinsmore--why we should want girls to emulate an abused child with zero self esteem is beyond me).
Posted by: kathryn at December 16, 2004 02:23 AM
Why is this stuff always from the 17th-19th century? Is stereotypical masculinity/femininty impossible in this century or something? If it is, then why would anyone want it? If it's not, what's the deal?
Posted by: ryan at December 16, 2004 07:48 AM
What's also really funny to me, is that on an aesthetic level its like they've managed to transcend kitsch right back into kitsch. I mean, in the 1950's kitsch was all the crap kids toys etc. done up in a colonial or western style. Now they're ripping off the kitsch from that era, generating a whole new level of kitsch.
Anyways, check this video out.
New levels of creepy.
Posted by: JosiahQ at December 16, 2004 09:50 AM
Elsie Dinsmore is such an awesome name. It sounds like a vile street urchin from a Dickens novel. The very vowels suggest "dingy." People should set aside portions of each day to create potential names for new VisionForum characters. Here's mine: Lucius Codwater.
Posted by: mesh at December 16, 2004 10:50 AM
This reminds me of how Douglas Wilson says feminism is the result of ungodly men not doing their jobs. I'm not saying he's wrong, but in order for feminism to rise in the 60's, the 50's--that gleeful, wholesome time of prosperity--had to happen. Isn't this kind of nostalgia asking for the same thing to happen again?
Posted by: Tommy Jolly at December 16, 2004 11:31 AM
Mesh,
Arthur Trumpbottom
Lance Hood
Emily Shuttlecock
Posted by: Phil at December 16, 2004 12:08 PM
Hey Josiah. Looks like you are doing well – so glad. I share your problem with this weird "reductionistic objectification of women." I know a lot of these folks through homeschooling, and it's as if they think the solution to increased secularization is through a time machine, rather than more difficult, complex thinking about how our faith and values can be successfully and relevantly translated in a new time and a new culture. Par exemple: ladiesagainstfeminism.com. It’s interesting, hilarious, and infuriating. By the by, I’m not sure modesty of dress is properly exemplified by 18th century, Jane Austen-esque garb. Was I the ONLY one who noticed all the cleavage in Pride & Prejudice?
Posted by: Ruckus at December 16, 2004 03:34 PM
Cleavage Prejudice would also be a good name.
Posted by: mesh at December 16, 2004 06:23 PM
Ciao, il mio amico! It is me. Though, after a long and exhausting argument with my dear spouse about the merits of keeping one's maiden name, I am now, officially, somethign else. :-(. Email me sometime -- I'd love to hear how you're doing.
Posted by: Ruckus at December 17, 2004 10:21 AM
Post a Comment About "It's Oh So Telling"
Email "It's Oh So Telling" to a friend!
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://chattablogs.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/17327
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference It's Oh So Telling:






