May 09, 2005

More on the North Carolina Baptist Church Debacle

Fox News has a report up, headlined: Pastor Says Ouster Was Misunderstanding

WAYNESVILLE, N.C.--Calling it a "great misunderstanding," the pastor of a small church who led the charge to remove nine members for their political beliefs tried to welcome them back Sunday, but some insisted he must leave for the wounds to heal.

The Rev. Chan Chandler didn't directly address the controversy during the service at East Waynesville Baptist Church, but issued a statement afterward through his attorney saying the church does not care about its members' political affiliations.

"No one has ever been voted from the membership of this church due to an individual's support or lack of support for a political party or candidate," he said.

Of course, the issue question here is: Is Pastor Chandler backpedalling over his previous comments, or have the ousted members indeed misunderstood, through admittedly and rightly hurt feelings and offense, what the pastor and the deacons board said and did? Who will ever be able to tell?

Nine members said they were ousted during a church gathering last week by about 40 others because they refused to support President Bush. They attended Sunday's service with their lawyer and many supporters.

So we have a "he said/they said" scenario. But opinions, including my own, have already been thrown into the ring. I wonder if things haven't already been hardened to such a degree that there's no going back.

Chandler noted their presence in his welcome to the congregation, saying, "I'm glad to see you all here. ... We are here today to worship the Lord. I hope this is what you are here for."

But Chandler's statement and his welcome didn't convince those members who were voted out that things would soon change, and some called for him to resign.

"This all started over politics and our right to vote for whoever we wanted to," said Thelma Lowe, who has been attending the church for 42 years. She and her husband Frank, a deacon at the church for 35 years, were among those voted out.

"Things will never be the same here until he leaves," she said.

Chandler, 33, has been at the church for less than three years.

I still maintain that though Pastor Chandler deeply mishandled things--in my own opinion which knows only a small fraction of the facts--the real issue is the already deep divisions and dysfunctions that already obtained in the congregation. Granted a pastor who's been there only three years can really exacerbate those divisions, but it's not really all that plausible that he created them in three years' time. If the church had started out healthy to begin with, they wouldn't have stood for it.

The ousted members have said Chandler told them during last year's presidential campaign that anyone who planned to vote for Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry needed to leave the church in the mountain town about 125 miles northwest of Charlotte.

"He needs to leave," said Marlene Casey, 42, a lifelong member. "A lot of blood, sweat and tears have been shed by the people he told to leave."

Added Lewis Inman, a deacon at the church who said he was voted out Monday: "He could have apologized and made everything right. He's not man enough."

Why is it that the ousted members are the only ones getting air time? I don't doubt their grievances, but I wonder if things are really the way they say they are? We just don't know.

And if Pastor Chandler didn't actually do what they accuse him of, he doesn't need to apologize for an act he didn't commit.

On the other hand, the parishioner is right in this sense: a leader just swallows his pride, even if he is completely in the right, and says, "Sorry." And then finds a way to bring healing. And in this case, though I doubt his leaving would actually bring healing to the congregation, I think his presence is going to perhaps prohibit it. On the other hand, his repentance and reconciliation may do more to help the congregation. We need to allow time for tempers to cool and grudges to be crucified.

Chandler invited all church members to attend a business meeting on Tuesday. "This should all be cleared up by the end of the week," he said in an interview after the service.

Um, hey, there, Sparky, I don't think it will happen that quick. Yep. I stick by my really inexperienced contention.

Chandler said he and his wife have received calls from around the nation--some of them threatening--since his politics in the pulpit made national news.

His actions also drew criticism from other Baptist clergymen in the town.

"This is very disturbing," the Rev. Robert Prince III, who leads the congregation at the nearby First Baptist Church, said Saturday. "I've been a pastor for more than 25 years, and I have never seen church members voted out for something like this."

Some members of his congregation, however, voiced their support for Chandler on Sunday.

"He's a wonderful, good old country boy," Pam Serafin said as she walked into the church. "There are always two sides to every story."

Indeed there are. And oh, how quick are some to pass judgment. Not very Christ-like if you ask me.

Posted by Clifton at May 9, 2005 11:37 AM | TrackBack
Comments

'Bring a Lawyer to Church Day'--I like it! This might change the world. My only question is this--How much are the lawyers charging to attend church?

Posted by: tidbit at May 9, 2005 03:37 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?